Bureaucrats, emailconfirmed, Administrators
1,168
edits
Project talk:Home: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Inception date: lol - is a property
(→Inception date: lol - is a property) |
|||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
:: To additionally have an "observed" birthday makes sense. Not sure how to best name it. We will not be able to fill it in most cases, though. --[[User:Kghbln|Kghbln]] ([[User talk:Kghbln|talk]]) 16:26, 18 September 2023 (UTC) | :: To additionally have an "observed" birthday makes sense. Not sure how to best name it. We will not be able to fill it in most cases, though. --[[User:Kghbln|Kghbln]] ([[User talk:Kghbln|talk]]) 16:26, 18 September 2023 (UTC) | ||
::: Hmm, inception day and birthday as a pair could be good enough, I believe. --[[User:Kghbln|Kghbln]] ([[User talk:Kghbln|talk]]) 16:27, 18 September 2023 (UTC) | ::: Hmm, inception day and birthday as a pair could be good enough, I believe. --[[User:Kghbln|Kghbln]] ([[User talk:Kghbln|talk]]) 16:27, 18 September 2023 (UTC) | ||
:::: I was being bold and created [[ | :::: I was being bold and created [[P38|service entry]]. In the end, I did not like naming this birthday. --[[User:Kghbln|Kghbln]] ([[User talk:Kghbln|talk]]) 11:12, 21 September 2023 (UTC) | ||
: We probably also need a date defining when Wikibase started being used | : We probably also need a date defining when Wikibase started being used for the wiki. I can imagine a wiki that only added Wikibase and friends sometime after its inception and birthday. In this case, the date should be when they started using the software, i.e., the day the first item or property was created. This date can also be determined for every instance using Wikibase. If not, they installed the software but never used it. Also good to know. --[[User:Kghbln|Kghbln]] ([[User talk:Kghbln|talk]]) 16:32, 18 September 2023 (UTC) PS [[Item:Q106|Zetawiki]] Is a good example for the latter case. | ||